Ola Electric burst onto India’s EV scene with bold promises—world-class products, deep vertical integration and a rapid path to profitability. Four years and countless headlines later, the company sits at a crossroads. Deliveries of its new Roadster are rolling out, Gen 3 scooters boast better margins, and in-house battery cells loom on the horizon. Yet the P&L still bleeds red, and skeptics abound.
In this post we cut through the noise to answer: What’s really happening at Ola Electric? And, more importantly for you, when (if ever) does it actually make money?
Snapshot
- FY25 Revenue: ₹4,514 Cr (↓10% YoY)
- FY25 Net Loss: ₹2,276 Cr
- Q1 FY26 Revenue: ₹828 Cr (↓50% YoY)
- Gross Margin (Q1 FY26): ~25.4%
- OPM (Q1 FY26): –29%
- Cash Reserves: ~₹3,200 Cr (Q1 FY26)
- Motorcycle Launch: Roadster underway, full rollout by Navratri
- Cell Factory: Operational, but integration deferred to FY27
1. Expectations Then vs. Reality Now
The Sep ’24 equity report projected a sequential ramp-up in both scooters and motorcycles, margin expansion from Gen3, and early cell integration—all supporting a path to EBITDA break-even by mid-FY26.
What happened:
- Revenue de-grew 10% in FY25, with volumes declining QoQ from peak Q3
- Warranty provision (₹250 Cr) dragged FY25 bottom line, but even excluding that, profitability was nowhere close
- Cell integration delayed to FY27 due to limited yield
- Gross margins improved to 25.4% (Q1 FY26), but operating expenses remain elevated, driving continued deep losses
The vision laid out in Sep ’24 was directionally correct, but execution slipped significantly on both timelines and economics.
2. Unit Economics Remain Stretched
Despite cost efforts, Material Cost as % of Sales averaged ~80–85%. Key reasons:
- High-cost battery packs (imported)
- Outsourced components in Gen1/2 still dominating fixed cost base
- Inefficiencies in service network + parts logistics
With Gen3, the company claims:
- In-house motors + electronics save 8–10% on BOM
- Warranty claims have dropped 50% vs Gen2
But Q1 FY26 OPM still came in at –29%, showing that margin gains are not flowing through fast enough.
Until gross margin crosses 30% and operating leverage kicks in, bottom-line breakeven remains out of reach.
3. Motorcycle Launch: High Hopes, Medium Visibility
Management is betting big on the Roadster to drive scale:
- Higher ASPs (~₹1.15L vs ₹1.07L for scooters)
- Targeting mid-sized cities & mass buyers
- 200 stores live now, with full pan-India presence by Navratri
But here’s the issue:
- Bike share is still <10% of Q1 volumes
- Advertising spends will spike as the network scales
- Unclear how ASP sustains once introductory pricing fades
Our View: Roadster success is critical, but it’s a 2–3 quarter ramp-up, not an immediate fix.
4. Cell Manufacturing: A Structural Moat, Not Yet Monetized
Ola’s 4680-format cell project has:
- Achieved ~60% yield as of Q1 FY26 (needs 80%+ for scale economics)
- First-gen production complete, but vehicle integration deferred to FY27
- Capex remaining: ~₹1,200 Cr
Why this matters:
- Captive cells could cut battery costs by 25–30%
- Enables Ola to control its most expensive input (battery = 45–50% of EV BOM)
But until cells are validated and integrated, this moat remains notional.
Key Risk: Any delay beyond FY27 pushes profitability further out, given how central cell savings are to the thesis.
5. Balance Sheet & Cash Burn
- Ola has ~₹3,200 Cr cash as of Q1 FY26
- Auto division is near operating breakeven on cash basis (per management)
- But consolidated cash burn remains high: ~₹150–200 Cr per quarter
Importantly, no new equity raise is expected, and existing debt (esp. cell capex) is covered via SBI consortium
Conclusion: Liquidity isn’t a constraint in FY26–27, but runway shrinks fast without visible EBITDA traction.
6. Valuation & Market Positioning
At the time of IPO, Ola was positioned as India’s “Tesla-equivalent” — with deep tech, full-stack control and a scalable model. Today:
- EV share in 2Ws is flattening near 5–6%
- Competition from TVS, Ather, and even Honda is intensifying
- Brand premium is eroding; Gen3 hasn’t redefined leadership
Valuation remains aggressive, even post-correction, if one benchmarks against established listed auto names with positive FCF and RoCE.
Final View: Hold Off – Too Early for Fundamentals-First Investors
Ola Electric continues to move in the right direction:
- Gross margin has improved
- Gen3 cost structure is tighter
- Battery cell moat is real (but 18–24 months out)
- Management has matured communication and reduced speculative aggression
But it’s not yet investable if you’re disciplined on:
- Consistent EBITDA (still negative)
- ROCE trajectory (non-existent)
- Forecastable unit economics (still evolving)
Unless FY26 ends with positive auto EBITDA, visible cell ramp-up, and Roadster traction, this remains a speculative EV bet—not a fundamental compounder.
Liked this piece?
📩 Subscribe to Theory of Compounding for deep, actionable insights on long-term investing in India.